<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New image search engine in beta, uses user-uploaded images as query</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paperclipmarketing.com/new-search-technologies/tineye-image-search-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paperclipmarketing.com/new-search-technologies/tineye-image-search-engine/</link>
	<description>does "new economy" mean we get to start over?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Lennington</title>
		<link>http://www.paperclipmarketing.com/new-search-technologies/tineye-image-search-engine/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lennington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paperclipmarketing.com/?p=45#comment-26</guid>
		<description>&lt;snip&gt; It seems to me that your comments are right on. We were not able to make money, and it is doubtful that this entity will either. In a sense, I am sad that someone else has finally done this. I guess that in the back of my mind I still held out the hope that we could find some compelling use for the technology while we still owned it exclusively, but that is not, apparently, to be. &lt;snip&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><snip> It seems to me that your comments are right on. We were not able to make money, and it is doubtful that this entity will either. In a sense, I am sad that someone else has finally done this. I guess that in the back of my mind I still held out the hope that we could find some compelling use for the technology while we still owned it exclusively, but that is not, apparently, to be. </snip><snip></snip></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
